|
Most theories of the OBE either claim that something leaves
the physical body, or that it does not. Then within these two major categories there are
several different types of explanation, and there is perhaps a last possibility; that any
such distinction is meaningless and artificial. The theories can be divided up as follows
[Bla82]:
(a physical double travels in the physical world)"
First there is the kind of explanation which suggests that
we each have a second physical body which can separate from the usual one. There are two
aspects to consider, one being the status and nature of the double which travels, and the
other being the status and nature of the world in which it travels. In this theory both
are material and interact with the normal physical world. You may immediately dismiss this
notion, saying that the double is non-physical.
To make this theory even worth considering it is necessary
to assume that this double is composed of some 'finer' or more subtle material that is
invisible to the untrained eye. This kind of idea is sometimes expressed in occult
writings. The idea appears, for example, as the 'etheric body' of the Theosophists.
Objections to this type of theory are numerous, and are made on both logical and empirical
grounds. First, what could the double be made of? The possibilities seem to range between
a complete solid duplicate and a kind of misty and insubstantial version. Another problem
with this kind of double is its appearance. If all have a second body why does it appear
to some as a blob or globe, to other as a flare, or light, and to yet others as a
duplicate of the physical body? Muldoon and Carrington [MC29] wrestled with this problem
and so has Tart [Tar74b].
If the notion of a physical double is problematic, the
notion that it travels in the physical world is just as much so. First there are the types
of errors made in OB perception. These tend not to be the sort of errors which might arise
from a poor perceptual system, but seem often to be fabricated error, or additions, as
well as omissions. Then sometimes the OB world is responsive to thought, just as in a
dream the scenery can change if the person imagines it changing; and lastly, there is the
fact that many OBEs merge into other kinds of experience. The OBEer may find himself
seeing places such as never were on earth, or he may meet strange monsters, religious
figures or caricature animals. All these features of the OBE make it harder to see the OB
world as the physical world at all, and lead one to the conclusion that the OB world is
more like a world of thoughts.
(Return to index)
(a non-physical double travels in the physical world)"
Many theories have suggested that the double is not
physical but non- physical, even though it travels in the physical world. Many occultists
believe there to be a whole range of non-physical worlds of differing qualities. Let us
look at some examples of this sort of theory to try to find out what is meant by it. Tart
[Tar74b, 78] refers to it as the 'natural' explanation. He describes this theory of the
OBE as follows '... in effect there is no need to explain it; it is just what it seems to
be. Man has a non-physical soul of some sort that is capable, under certain conditions, of
leaving the physical seat of consciousness. While it is like an ordinary physical body in
some ways, it is not subject to most of the physical laws of space and time and so is able
to travel at will.'
The 'theta aspect' has been mentioned in connection with
detection experiments. Morris et. al. [MHJHR78] explain that '... the OBE may be more than
a special psi-conductive state; they hold that it may in fact be evidence of an aspect of
the self which is capable of surviving bodily death. For convenience, such a hypothetical
aspect of the self will hereafter be referred to as a Theta Aspect (T.A.).' According to
Osis and Mitchell [OM77] it is possible that '... some part of the personality is
temporarily out of the body,' and many occult theories involve a non- physical astral
double rather than a physical one.
Blackmore criticizes this view [Bla82]. She claims if the
'soul' is to interact with the objects of the physical world so as to perceive them then
it should not only be detectable, but all the other problems of previous theories arise.
On the other hand, if this 'soul' does not interact with the physical, then it cannot
possibly do what is expected of it in this theory, namely travel in the physical world.
She sees no escape from the dilemma. Moreover, she claims there is already evidence that
what is seen in an OBE is not, in any case, the physical world.
(Return to index)
(a non-physical double travels in a non-physical, but
'objective,' astral world)
Each of the theories presented thus far support a
conclusion that OBEs do not take place in the physical world at all, but in a
thought-created or mental world. Each of the next three types of theory start from this
premise, but they are very different and lead to totally different conceptions of the
experience.
The term 'mental world' could mean several different
things. It could mean the purely private world created by each of us in our thinking. One
possibility is that there is another world (or worlds) which is mental but is in some
sense shared, or objective and in which we can all travel if we attain certain states of
consciousness. The important question now becomes whether the OB world is peculiar to each
individual, or shared and accessible to all.
Occultists have suggested that there is a shared thought
world. There are many other versions of this kind of theory. The pertinent features of
this idea are that there is a non-physical OB world which is accessible by thought, that
it is manipulable by thought, and that it is the product of the mind of more than just one
person.
Tart [74b, 78], as one of his five theories of the OBE,
suggests what he calls the 'mentally-manipulatable-state explanation.' He raises here the
familiar problem of, as he puts it 'where the pajamas come from.' That is, if the OBE
involves the separation of a 'spirit' or 'soul' we have to include the possibility of
spiritual dinner jackets and tie pins. Of course any theory which postulates 'thought
created' world solves this problem. Tart therefore suggested that a non-physical second
body travels in a non-physical world which is capable of being manipulated or changed by
'the conscious and non-conscious thoughts and desires of the person whose second body is
in that space.'
In 1951 Muldoon and Carrington had come to a similar
conclusion [MC51]. Muldoon states '... one thing is clear to me -- the clothing of the
phantom is created, and is not a counterpart of the physical clothing.' Through his
observations he came to the conclusion that 'Thought creates in the astral, ... In fact
the whole astral world is governed by thought.' But he did not mean it was a private world
of thoughts.
Also relevant here is the occult notion of thought forms.
Theosophists Besant and Leadbeater describe the creation of thought forms by the mental
and desire bodies, and their manifestations as floating forms in the mental and astral
planes. All physical objects are supposed to have their astral counterparts and so when
traveling in the astral one sees a mixture of the astral forms of physical things and
thought created, or purely astral, entities.
There are other versions of a similar idea. For example
Whiteman questions the 'one-space theory' of OBEs [Whi75], and Poynton follow him
suggesting '... what is described is not the physical world as actualized by the senses of
the physical body, but a copy, more or less exact, of the physical world' [Poy75]. Rogo
[Rog78b] suggests that the OBE takes place in a non-physical duplicate world which is just
as 'real' to the OBEer as our world is to us.
The idea of shared thought world, attractive as it is, has
some serious problems. The first problem relates to how the thoughts of different people
could be combined together to create an astral world and the second problem concerns the
storage of ideas. The idea that thoughts can persist independently of the brain has been a
cornerstone of many occult theories, but also parapsychologists have used a similar idea
to try to explain ESP.
According to Blackmore [Bla82] the problem is essentially
one of coding. We know that when a person remembers something he has first processed the
incoming information, thought about it, structured it, and turned it into a manageable
form using some sort of code. We presume that the information persists in this form until
needed when the person can use the same coding system to retrieve it and use it. Even if
we don't understand the details of how this system works, there is in principle no problem
for one person because he uses the same system both in storing the material and retrieving
it. But if thoughts are stored in the astral world, then we have to say that one person
can store them there and another can get them out again. And that other person may have
entirely different ways of coding information. So how can these thoughts in the astral
possibly make sense to him?
(Return to index)
(imagination plus ESP)
The OBE might involve only imaginary traveling in a private
imaginary world. According to this type of theory, nothing leaves the body in an OBE. The
advantage of such a theory is that it avoids all the problems of the previous ones since
it involves no astral worlds and other bodies. Certain parapsychologists have tried to
incorporate the evidence that ESP occurs during OBEs by suggesting that the OBE is
'imagination plus ESP' or PK. For example, one of Tarts's five theories is the
'hallucination-plus- psi explanation.' According to this theory, 'For those cases of OBEs
in which veridical information about distant events is obtained, it is postulated that
ESP, which is well proved, works on a nonconscious level, and this information is used by
the subconscious mind to arrange the hallucinatory or dream scene so that it corresponds
to the reality scene' [Tar78].
Osis [Osi75] contrasts his 'ecsomatic hypothesis' with
'traveling fantasy plus ESP' and Morris [MHJHR78] compares the theory that 'some tangible
aspect of self can expand beyond the body' with what he call the 'psi- favorable state'
theory. In parapsychology many states have been thought to be conducive to ESP. They
include relaxation, the use of ganzfeld or unpatterned stimulation, and dreaming. There
are many reasons why an OBE might be thought of as a psi-conductive state. Palmer
suggested that it might induce attitudes and expectations consistent with psi, thereby
facilitating its occurrence [Pal74].
This sort of theory is not satisfying. It appears to avoid
all the previous problems and yet to be able to cope with the paranormal aspects of the
experience. According to Blackmore 'Calling the OBE imagination or hallucination tells us
very little, and adding the words 'plus ESP' adds nothing. We know little enough about
ESP. It is defined negatively, and we cannot stop and start it or control it in any way.'
(Return to index)
This theory amounts to the statement that all the details
of the OBE are to be accounted for in psychological terms. Nothing leaves the body in an
OBE, the astral body and astral world are products of the imagination and the OBE itself
provides no hope for survival. Osis has called the followers of such theories 'nothing
but-ers,' reducing the OBE to 'nothing but a psychopathological oddity' [Osi81].
Among psychological approaches there have been
psychoanalytic interpretations, analogies between the 'tunnel' and the birth experience;
the creation of the double has been seen as an act of narcissism or as a way of denying
the inevitable mortality of the human body. Then there have been theories which treat the
near-death experience as a form of depersonalization or regression to primitive modes of
thinking, and those which treat it as involving an archetype.
John Palmer used a mixture of psychological and
psychoanalytical concepts in his account [Pal78a]. He made the crucial point that the OBE
is neither potentially nor actually a psychic phenomenon. An OBE may be associated with
psychic events but the experience itself, just like any other experience, is not the kind
of thing which can be either psychic or not. He went on to suggest that the OBE almost
always occurs in a hypnagogic state. Within this state it is triggered by a change in the
person's body concept which results from a reduction or other change in proprioceptive
stimulation. This change then threatens the self concept and the threat activates deep
unconscious processes. These processes try to re-establish the person's sense of
individual identity as quickly and economically as possible in a way that follows the laws
of the Freudian primary process. According to Palmer it is this attempt to regain identity
which constitutes the OBE.
Since the whole purpose of the OBE is to avoid a threat,
the person will usually remain unaware of that threat and of the change in body image
which precipitated it. However, Palmer adds that it is possible, with practice, to gain
ego-control over the primary process activity. Of course the OBE is, at best, only a
partial solution to the threat and both ego and primary process strive to regain the
normal body concept. As soon as they succeed the OBE ends. For Palmer any psychic
abilities which manifest themselves during an OBE do so more because of the hypnagogic
state than because anything leaves the body.
This theory has much in its favor. It has no need of astral
bodies or other worlds and so avoids all the problems of the earlier theories. It makes
sense of the situations in which the OBE occurs, and the way it varies with the situation,
and it relates the OBE to other experiences. However, the theory is not without its own
problems. It depends heavily on the idea that the OBE is a means of avoiding a threat to
the integrity of the individual and the anxiety which such a threat would arouse. But it
is not clear that the OBE would not provide an even greater threat than the original
change in body concepts. Sometimes OBEers are terrified that they will not be able to 'get
back in' which is surely also a threat.
Susan Blackmore [Bla82] bases her theory on the claim that
the evidence of paranormal events during the OBE is limited and unconvincing. She
therefore asserts that the claims for ESP and PK in OBEs are not impossible but there is
actually not very much evidence which has to be 'explained away' in this fashion.
Blackmore suggests that the OBE is best seen as an altered state of consciousness (ASC)
and is best understood in relation to other ASCs. Everything perceived in an OBE is a
product of memory and imagination, and during the OBE one's own imagination is more
vividly experienced than it is in everyday life. In other words the experience is a kind
of privileged peek into the contents of one's own mind.
Blackmore suggests that in the case of the OBE the
following are necessary: vivid and detailed imagery; low reality testing so that memories
and images may seems 'real'; sensory input from the body reduced or not attended to;
awareness and logical thinking maintained. She shows how these prerequisites can lead to
an altered state of which one form is the semi- stable OBE and indicates related states,
such as lucid dreaming, and shows how experience can change into others when conditions,
or ways or thinking, change.
This theory accounts adequately for cases of so-called
traveling clairvoyance, where the subject does not necessarily see his body, but is aware
of a distant scene. It accounts less well for cases of conscious projection, where the
subjects feels himself to be at a distant location and is actually perceived by a person
at that location. It also underestimates the veridical aspect of perception in cases where
there is no apparent distortion by the imagination, in other words when the scene viewed
from another point of space corresponds exactly with what one might expect to observe from
that point; for instance a room seen from the vantage point of the ceiling. The question
of perceptual distortion is related to the degree of interference by the imagination: the
greater the imaginative element, the less veridical the perception of the place.
Stephen LaBerge describes a theory in which OBEs occur when
people lose input from their sense organs, as happens at the onset of sleep, while
retaining consciousness [LL91]. This combination of events is especially likely when a
person passes directly from waking into REM sleep. In both states the mind is alert and
active, but in waking it is processing sensory input from the outside world, while in
dreaming it is creating a mental model independent of sensory input. This model includes a
body. When dreaming, we generally experience ourselves in a body much like the 'real' one,
because that is what we are used to. However, our internal senses reside in the physical
body, which when we are awake inform us about our position in space and about the movement
of our limbs. This information is cut off in REM sleep. Therefore, we can dream of doing
all kinds of things with our dream bodies -- flying, dancing, running from monsters, being
dismembered -- all while our physical bodies lie safely in bed.
During a WILD, or sleep paralysis, the awake and alert mind
keeps up its good work of showing us the world it expects is out there -- although it can
no longer sense it. So, then we are in a mental dream world. Possibly we feel the
cessation of the sensation of gravity as that part of sensory input shuts down, and then
feel that we are suddenly lighter and float up, rising from the place where we know our
real body to be lying still. The room around us looks about the same as it would if we
were awake, because such in image represents our brain's best guess about where we are. If
we did not know that we had just fallen asleep, we might well think that we were awake,
still in touch with the physical world, and that something mighty strange was happening --
a departure of the mind from the physical body.
The unusual feeling of leaving the body is exciting and
alarming. This, combined with the realistic imagery of the bedroom is enough to account
for the conviction of many OBE experients' that 'it was too real to be a dream.' Dreams,
too, can be astonishingly real, especially if you are attending to their realness.
Usually, we pass through our dreams without thinking much about them, and upon awakening
remember little of them. Hence, they seem 'unreal.' But waking life is also like that --
our memory for a typical, mundane day is flat and lacking in detail. It is only the novel,
exciting, or frightening events that leave vivid impressions. If we stop what we are
doing, we can look around and say, 'Yes, this world looks solid and real.' But, if you
look back and try to recall, for instance, brushing your teeth this morning, your memory
is likely to be vague and not very life-like. Contrast this kind of event to a past event
that excited or alarmed you, which is likely to seem much more 'real' in retrospect.
(Return to index)
Perhaps all the distinctions and problems are artificial,
perhaps the mind is neither 'in' nor 'out' of the body. Grosso argues the possibility
[Gro81] that one is always 'out' and in an OBE just becomes conscious of that fact. Should
the distinction between normal and paranormal then be dropped?
Let us consider the state of affair that is considered
normal: the 'in-the- body' experience. What does it mean to be in a body? LaBerge [LL91]
argues that saying that one is in a body implies that the self is an object with definite
borders capable of being contained by the boundaries of another object -- the physical
body. However, we do not have any evidence that the self is such a concrete thing. What we
think of as 'out-of-body' in an OBE is the experience of the self. This experience of
being 'in' a body is normally based on perceptual input from the senses of both the world
external to the body and the processes within the body. These things give us a sense of
localization of the self in space. However, it is the body, and its sense organs, that
occupy a specific locus, not the self. The self is not the body or the brain. If we think
that the self is a product of brain function, even this does not make it reasonable to
state that the self is in the brain -- is the meaning contained in these words in this
page? It may not make any sense on an objective level to say that the self is anywhere.
Rather, the self is where it feels itself to be. Its location is purely subjective and
derived from input from the sensory organs.
Putting aside the question of the essential nature of the
self, perception is undeniably a phenomenon tied to brain function. So, when we find
ourselves experiencing a world that seems much like the one we are used to perceiving with
our usual equipment -- eyes, ears, etc., all things linked to our brains, it would be
logical to assume that it is our usual brain creating the experience. And, if we were to
really leave our bodies -- severing all connection with them -- it would be illogical to
assume that we would see the world in the same way. Therefore, LaBerge points out,
although no amount of contradictory evidence can rule out the possibility of a real 'out
of body experience,' in which an individual exists in some form entirely independent of
the body, it is highly unlikely that such a form would utilize perceptual systems
identical to those of the physical human form.
Spiritual teachings tell us that we have a reality beyond
that of this world. LaBerge concludes that the OBE may not be, as it is easily
interpreted, a literal separation of the soul from the crude physical body, but it is an
indication of the vastness of the potential that lies wholly within our minds. 'The worlds
we create in dreams and OBEs are as real as this one, and yet hold infinitely more
variety. How much more exhilarating to be "out-of-body" in a world where the
only limit is the imagination than to be in the physical world in a powerless body of
ether! Freed of the constraints imposed by physical life, expanded by awareness that
limits can be transcended, who knows what we could be, or become?' [LL91].
(Return to index)
Most people taking part in discussions of OBEs seem
primarily interested in developing and ability to do so themselves and to learn to control
the experience. Aids to people wanting to develop such abilities, which include books,
audio tapes which are claimed to assist in the process, and training programs are
available from:
Monroe Institute
Route 1, Box 175
Faber, Virginia 22938-9749
U.S.A.
Phone: 804-361-1252
Product Orders: 800-541-2488
(Return to index)
[Bla82] Blackmore, S. J. Beyond the Body: an Investigation of Out-of-
Body Experiences (London: Heinemann, 1982)
[Bla84] ---. 'A postal survey of OBEs and other experiences' (Journal
of the Society for Psychical Research, 1984, 52, pp. 227-244)
[Bla88] ---. 'A Theory of lucid dreams and OBEs' in Conscious Mind,
Sleeping Brain (ed. Gackenbach, J. and LaBerge, S.: New York:
Plenum: 1988, pp. 373-387)
[Bla91] ---. 'Lucid Dreaming: Awake in Your Sleep?' (Skeptical
Inquirer, 1991, 15, pp. 362-370)
[Bre71] Brennan, J. H. Astral Doorways (Wellingborough, Northants:
Aquarian Press, 1971)
[Bro62] Broad, C. D. Lectures on Psychical Research (London: Routledge
and Kegan Paul, 1962)
[Con72] Conway, D. Magic: An Occult Primer (London: Jonathan Cape,
1972, and Mayflower Books, St. Albans, 1974)
[Cro61] Crookall, R. The Study and Practice of Astral Projection
(London: Aquarian Press, 1961)
[Cro63] ---. 'Only Psychological Fact?' (Light, 1963, 83, pp. 171-182)
[Cro64a] ---. More Astral Projections (London: Aquarian Press, 1964)
[Cro64b] ---. The Techniques of Astral Projection: Denouement After
Fifty Years (London: Aquarian Press, 1964)
[Cro69a] ---. The Interpretation of Cosmic and Mystical Experiences
(London: James Clarke & Co., 1969)
[Cro69b] ---. The Mechanisms of Astral Projection: Denouement After
Seventy Years (Moradabad, India: Darshana International, 1969)
[Cro70a] ---. The Jung-Jaffe View of Out-of-the-Body Experiences (World
Fellowship Press, 1970)
[Cro70b] ---. Out-of-the-Body Experiences (New York: University Books,
1970)
[Cro78] ---. What Happens When You Die (Gerrards Cross: Colin Smythe,
1978)
[Eas62] Eastman, M. 'Out-of-the-Body Experiences' (Proceedings of the
Society for Psychical Research, 1962, 53, pp. 227-309)
[Eva60] Evans-Wentz, W. Y. The Tibetan Book of the Dead (London:
Oxford University Press, 1960)
[Far76] Faraday, A. The dream game (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin,
1976)
[Fox62] Fox, O. Astral Projection (New York: University Books Inc.,
1962)
[Gau82] Gauld, A. Mediumship and Survival: A Century of Investigations
(London: Heinemann, 1982)
[Gay74] Gaynor, F. Dictionary of Mysticism (London: Wildwood House,
1974)
[GB89] Gackenbach, J. and Bosveld, J. Control Your Dreams (New York:
Harper & Row, 1989)
[GL88] Gackenbach, J. and LaBerge, S. eds. Conscious Mind, Sleeping
Brain (New York: Plenum, 1988)
[Gla74] Glaskin, G. M. Windows of the Mind: The Christos Experience
(London: Wildwood, 1974)
[Gli89] Glicksohn, J. 'The structure of subjective experience:
Interdependencies along the sleep-wakefulness continuum'
(Journal of Mental Imagery, 1989, 13, pp. 99-106)
[GMF86] Gurney, E., Myers, F. W. H. and Podmore, F. Phantasms of the
Living (2 Vols. London: Trubner & Co., 1886)
[Gre66] Green, C. E. 'Spontaneous "Paranormal" Experiences in Relation
to Sex and Academic Background' (Journal of the Society for
Psychical Research, 1966, 43, pp. 357-363)
[Gre67] ---. 'Ecsomatic Experiences and Related Phenomena' (Journal of
the Society for Psychical Research, 1967, 44, pp. 111-131)
[Gre68a] ---. Out-of-the-Body Experiences (London: Hamish Hamilton,
1968)
[Gre68b] ---. Lucid Dreams (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1968)
[Gro81] Grosso, M. 'Toward an Explanation of Near-Death Phenomena'
(Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 1981,
75, pp. 37-60)
[GT84] Gabbard, G. O. and Twemlow, S. W. With the eyes of the mind
(New York: Praeger, 1984)
[Har54] Hart, H. 'ESP Projection: Spontaneous Cases and the Experimental
Method' (Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research,
1954, 48, pp. 121-146)
[Har56] ---. 'Six Theories about Apparations' (Proceedings of the
Society for Physical Research, 1953-6, 50, pp. 153-239)
[Hea78] Hearne, K. M. T. Lucid Dreams: An Electrophysiological and
Psychological Study (Unpublished PhD thesis, University of
Liverpool, 1978)
[Hea90] ---. The Dream Machine (Northants: Aquarian, 1990)
[HGRLJ76] Haraldson, E., Gudmundsdottir, A., Ragnarsson, A., Loftsson, J.
and Jonsson, S. 'National Survey of Psychical Experiences and
Attitudes Towards the Paranormal in Iceland' in Research in
Parapsychology 1976 (Morris, J. D., Roll, W. G. and Morris,
R. L. eds. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press: 1977, pp. 182-186)
[HJH74] Hartwell, J., Janis, J. and Harary, S. B. 'A Study of the
Physiological Variables Associated with Out-of-Body
Experiences' (in Research in Parapsychology 1974, Morris,
J. D., Roll, W. G. and Morris, R. L. eds. Metuchen, N. J.:
Scarecrow Press 1975, pp. 127-129)
[Hon79] Honegger, B. 'Correspondence' (Parapsychology Review, 1979,
10, pp. 24-26)
[Irw80] Irwin, H. J. 'Out of the Body Down Under: Some Cognitive
Characteristics of Australian Students Reporting OOBEs'
(Journal of the Society for Physical Research, 1980, 50, pp.
448-459)
[Irw81a] ---. Letter to the Editor (Journal of the Society for
Psychical Research, 1981, 51, pp. 118-120)
[Irw81b] ---. 'Some Psychological Dimensions of the Out-of-Body
Experience' (Parapsychology Review, 1981, 12, No. 4, pp. 1-6)
[Irw88] ---. 'Out-of-Body Experiences and Dream Lucidity: Empirical
Perspectives' in Conscious Mind, Sleeping Brain (ed.
Gackenbach, J. and LaBerge, S.: New York: Plenum: 1988, pp.
353-371)
[JHHLM74] Janis, J., Hartwell, J., Harary, S. B., Levin, J. and Morris,
R. L. 'A description of the Physiological Variables Connected
with an Out-of-Body Study' in Research in Parapsychology 1973,
Roll, W. G., Morris, R. L. and Morris, J. D., eds. (Metuchen,
N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1974, pp. 36-37)
[LaB85] LaBerge, S. Lucid Dreaming (Los Angeles: Tarcher, 1985)
[LL91] LaBerge, S. and Levitan, L. 'Other Worlds: Out-of-Body
Experiences and Lucid Dreams' (NightLight newsletter, 1991)
[MC29] Muldoon, S. and Carrington, H. The Projection of the Astral
Body (London: Rider & Co., 1929)
[MC51] ---. The Phenomena of Astral Projection (London: Rider & Co.,
1951)
[MHJHR78] Morris, R. L., Harary, S. B., Janis, J., Hartwell, J. and Roll,
W. G. 'Studies of Communication During Out-of-Body
Experiences' (Journal of the American Society for Psychical
Research, 1978, 72, pp. 1-22)
[Mit73] Mitchell, J. 'Out-of-the-Body vision' (Psychic, 1973, 4. Also
in Rogo, D. S., ed. Mind Beyond the Body, New York: Penguin,
1978, pp. 154-161)
[Mon71] Monroe, R. A. Journeys Out of the Body (New York: Doubleday,
1971)
[Moo75] Moody, R. A. Life after Life (Covinda, G. A.: Mockingbird,
1975, and Bantam, 1976)
[Moo77] ---. Reflections on Life after Life (New York: Mockingbird,
1977)
[Mor73] Morris, R. L. 'The Use of Detector for Out-of-Body
Experiences' (in Research in Parapsychology 1973, Roll, W. G.,
Morris, R. L. and Morris, J. D. eds. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow
Press, 1974, pp. 114-116)
[Mye03] Myers, F. W. H. Human Personality and its Survival of Bodily
Death (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1903)
[NK76] Noyes, R. and Kletti, R. 'Depersonalisation in the Face of
Life-threatening Danger: A Description' (Psychiatry, 1976, 39,
pp. 19-27)
[Noy72] Noyes, R. 'The Experience of Dying' (Psychiatry, 1972, 35, pp.
174-184)
[OM77] Osis, K. and Mitchell, J. L. 'Psysiological Correlates of
Reported Out-of-Body Experiences' (Journal of the Society for
Psychical Research, 1977, 49, pp. 525-536)
[Oph61] Ophiel. The Art and Practice of Astral Projection (New York:
Samuel Weiser, 1961)
[Osi73] Osis, K. 'Perspectives for Out-of-Body Research' (in Research
in Parapsychology 1973, Roll, W. G., Morris, R. L. and Morris,
J. D. eds. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1974, pp. 110-113)
[Osi75] ---. 'Perceptual Experiments on Out-of-Body Experiences' (in
Research in Parapsychology 1974, Morris, J. D., Roll, W. G. and
Morris, R. L. eds. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1975, pp.
53-55)
[Osi81] ---. 'Out-of-the-Body Experiences: A Personal View' (Psi News,
1981, 4, No. 3)
[Pal74] Palmer, J. 'Some New Directions for Research' (in Research in
Parapsychology 1973, Roll, W. G., Morris, R. L. and Morris,
J. D. eds. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1974, pp. 107-110)
[Pal78a] ---. 'The Out-of-Body Experience: A Psychological Theory'
(Parapsychology Review, 1978, 9, pp. 19-22)
[Pal79a] ---. 'ESP and Out-of-Body Experiences: EEG Correlates' (in
Research in Parapsychology 1978, Roll, W. G. ed. Metuchen,
N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1979, p. 135-138)
[Pal79b] ---. 'A Community Mail Survey of Psychic Experiences' (Journal
of the American Society for Psychical Research, 1979, 73, pp.
221-252)
[PD75] Palmer, J. and Dennis, M. 'A Community Mail Survey of Psychic
Experiences' (in Research in Parapsychology 1974, Morris,
J. D., Roll, W. G. and Morris, R. L. eds. Metuchen, N. J.:
Scarecrow Press, 1975, pp. 130-133)
[PL75a] Palmer, J. and Lieberman, R. 'ESP and Out-of-Body Experiences:
The Effect of Psychological Set' (in Research in Parapsychology
1974, Morris, J. D., Roll, W. G. and Morris, R. L. eds.
Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1975, pp. 122-127)
[PL75b] ---. 'The Influence of Psychological Set on ESP and Out-of-
Body Experiences' (Journal of the American Society for
Psychological Research, 1975, 69, pp. 193-214)
[PL76] ---. 'ESP and Out-of-Body Experiences: A Further Study' (in
Research in Parapsychology 1975, Morris, J. D., Roll, W. G. and
Morris, R. L. eds. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1976, pp.
102-106)
[Poy75] Poynton, J. C. 'Results of an Out-of-the-Body Survey' (in
Parapsychology in South Africa, Poynton, J. C. ed.
Johannesburg: South African Society for Psychical Research,
1975)
[PV74a] Palmer, J. and Vassar, C. 'Toward Experimental Induction of
the Out-of-the-Body Experience' (in Research in Parapsychology
1973, Roll, W. G., Morris, R. L. and Morris, J. D. eds.
Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1974, pp. 38-41)
[PV74b] ---. 'ESP and Out-of-the-Body Experiences: An Exploratory
Study' (Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research,
1974, 68, pp. 257-280)
[Raw78] Rawlings, M. Beyond Death's Door (Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas
Nelson Co., 1978)
[Rin79] Ring, K. 'Further Studies of the Near-Death Experience'
(Theta, 1979, 7, pp. 1-3)
[Rin80] ---. Life at Death (New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan,
1980)
[Rog78b] Rogo, D. S. 'The Out-of-Body Experiences: Some Personal Views
and Reflections' (in Rogo, D. S. ed. Mind Beyond the Body, New
York: Penguin, 1978, pp. 349-365)
[Rog78c] ---. 'Experiments with Blue Harary' (in Rogo, D. S. ed. Mind
Beyond the Body, New York: Penguin, 1978, pp. 170-92)
[Sab82] Sabom, M. Recollections of Death (London: Harper & Row, 1982)
[Sal82] Salley, R. D. 'REM Sleep Phenomena During Out-of-Body
Experiences' (Journal of the American Society for Psychical
Research, 1982, 76, pp. 157-165)
[She78] Sheils, D. 'A Cross-cultural Study of Beliefs in Out-of-the-
Body Experiences' (Journal of the Society for Psychical
Research, 1978, 49, pp. 697-741)
[SI81] Smith, P. and Irwin, H. 'Out-of-Body Experiences, Needs and the
Experimental Approach: A Laboratory Study' (Parapsychology
Review, 1981, pp. 65-75)
[Sie77] Siegel, R. K. 'Hallucinations' (Scientific American, 1977,
237, pp. 132-140)
[Smi65] Smith, S. The Enigma of Out-of-Body Travel (Garrett
Publications, 1965)
[Tar67] Tart, C. T. 'A Second Psychophysiological Study of Out-of-the-
Body Experiences in a Gifted Subject' (International Journal of
Parapsychology, 1967, 9, pp. 251-258)
[Tar68] ---. 'A Psychophysiological Study of Out-of-the-Body
Experiences in a Selected Subject' (Journal of the American
Society for Psychical Research, 1968, 62, pp. 3-27)
[Tar71] ---. On Being Stoned: A Psychological Study of Marijuana
Intoxication (Palo Alto, CA.: Science and Behaviour Books,
1971)
[Tar72a] ---. Introduction to Journeys Out-of-the-Body by R. Monroe
(London: Souvenir Press, 1972)
[Tar72b] ---. 'States of Consciousness and State-specific Sciences'
(Science, 1972, 176, pp. 1203-1210)
[Tar74a] ---. 'Some Methodological Problems in OOBE Research' (in
Research in Parapsychology 1973, Roll, W. G., Morris, R. L. and
Morris, J. D. eds. Metuchen, N. J.: Scarecrow Press, 1974, pp.
116-120)
[Tar74b] ---. 'Out-of-the-Body Experiences' (in Mitchell, E. ed.
Psychic Exploration, New York: G. P. Putnams Sons, 1974, pp.
349-373)
[Tar78] ---. 'Paranormal Theories About the Out-of-Body Experience'
(in Rogo, D. S. ed. Mind Beyond the Body, New York: Penguin,
1978, pp. 338-345)
[Tho83] Tholey, P. 'Techniques for Controlling and Manipulating Lucid
Dreams' (Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1983, 57, pp. 79-90)
[Van13] Van Eeden, F. 'A study of dreams' (Proceedings of the Society
for Psychical Research, 1913, 26, pp. 431-461)
[Whi75] Whiteman, J. H. M. 'The Scientific Evaluation of Out-of-the-
Body Experiences' (in J. C. Poynton ed. Parapsychology in South
Africa, Johannesburg: South African Society for Psychical
Research, 1975, pp. 95-108)
(Return to index)
|
